If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Status: New Guy
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7
|
For you Guru's, please, help me through this.
It has been traditional to use a 71 roots or screw design. However, thoughts would be appreciated regarding a 16:71 or there abouts case, bulk headed half way back and two independant rotor systems. The front rotors could be roots and the back set screw or perhaps some other combination. Reasoning is, two smaller chambers offer reduced "pressure up" time and provide other potential control options. Plus, the concept may reduce heat soak and sustained parasitic drag. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Status: Venerable Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ocean City, MD
Posts: 1,873
|
how do you equalize the pressures so intake runners in the back or front naturally would run leanner depending on how it unfolded in the runners. I think that would be a mess to figure out and I can make more power with a pulley change!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|